un-fucking-believable
Nov. 25th, 2006 04:25 pmSo, apparently the guy Bush appointed to run family planning services at the Department of Health and Human Services DOESN'T APPROVE OF CONTRACEPTION. Like, ever, even for married people.
There's a NYTimes editorial about it, but here are some of the choice quotes:
"Mr. Bush has tapped Eric Keroack, a doctor affiliated with a group vehemently opposed to birth control and someone nationally known for his wacky theory about reproductive health."
"The group also has a policy against dispensing contraception even to married women. It has stated on its Web site that the distribution of contraceptive drugs or devices is “demeaning to women, degrading of human sexuality and adverse to human health and happiness.”
"Dr. Keroack has promoted the novel argument that sex with multiple partners alters brain chemistry in a way that makes it harder for women to form bonding relationships."
"But to the unchastened Bush White House, apparent opposition to contraceptives, abortion and science was the opposite of disqualifying. It was a winning trifecta."
Here's a link to the whole thing.
There's a NYTimes editorial about it, but here are some of the choice quotes:
"Mr. Bush has tapped Eric Keroack, a doctor affiliated with a group vehemently opposed to birth control and someone nationally known for his wacky theory about reproductive health."
"The group also has a policy against dispensing contraception even to married women. It has stated on its Web site that the distribution of contraceptive drugs or devices is “demeaning to women, degrading of human sexuality and adverse to human health and happiness.”
"Dr. Keroack has promoted the novel argument that sex with multiple partners alters brain chemistry in a way that makes it harder for women to form bonding relationships."
"But to the unchastened Bush White House, apparent opposition to contraceptives, abortion and science was the opposite of disqualifying. It was a winning trifecta."
Here's a link to the whole thing.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-26 02:26 am (UTC)Ass.
no subject
Date: 2006-11-26 07:01 am (UTC)